<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Destruction of biz&#8217;s property OK when it prevents global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cfosnafu.com/destruction-of-bizs-property-ok-when-it-prevents-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com/destruction-of-bizs-property-ok-when-it-prevents-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Some days it should be legal to keep two sets of books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wenzel</title>
		<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com/destruction-of-bizs-property-ok-when-it-prevents-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Wenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfosnafu.com/?p=269#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe the interpretation of this law.  Can the utility now damage vehicles, houses and other property of  someone because the items will cause pollution and climate change, which could cause greater damage ?  If the jury agrees with green Peace, they better get out of their houses, which have to be heated.    Maybe Green Peace should go live in the woods instead of houses that use electricity and have to be heated.   And they should walk, instead of driving vehicles !  This is Political Correctness taken way too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe the interpretation of this law.  Can the utility now damage vehicles, houses and other property of  someone because the items will cause pollution and climate change, which could cause greater damage ?  If the jury agrees with green Peace, they better get out of their houses, which have to be heated.    Maybe Green Peace should go live in the woods instead of houses that use electricity and have to be heated.   And they should walk, instead of driving vehicles !  This is Political Correctness taken way too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Destruction of biz’s property OK when it prevents global warming &#124; Criminal Defense Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com/destruction-of-bizs-property-ok-when-it-prevents-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Destruction of biz’s property OK when it prevents global warming &#124; Criminal Defense Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfosnafu.com/?p=269#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original: Destruction of biz’s property OK when it prevents global warming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original: Destruction of biz’s property OK when it prevents global warming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

