<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CFOsnafu.com &#187; Santa Claus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cfosnafu.com/tag/santa-claus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com</link>
	<description>Some days it should be legal to keep two sets of books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Police balk at hairy, expensive situation</title>
		<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com/police-balk-at-hairy-expensive-situation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cfosnafu.com/police-balk-at-hairy-expensive-situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darlene Watson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Seemed like a good idea at the time"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facial hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Claus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skin condition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfosnafu.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Houston city officials are taking a slice out of their coffers to support an unpopular beard ban &#8212; and it&#8217;s got several officers crying discrimination. 
Four Houston police officers have brought a lawsuit against the city because of a no-facial hair policy that was put in place in 1993. The city council has unanimously authorized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Houston city officials are taking a slice out of their coffers to support an unpopular beard ban &#8212; and it&#8217;s got several officers crying discrimination. <span id="more-145"></span></p>
<p>Four Houston police officers have brought a lawsuit against the city because of a no-facial hair policy that was put in place in 1993. The city council has unanimously authorized spending up to $150K to support the ban (that&#8217;s a lot of beard-trimmers if you ask us). When asked why facial hair had to go, the city responded by claiming smooth faces make officers appear both conservative and professional.</p>
<p>The officers filed the lawsuit saying the ban discriminates against men who suffer from skin conditions that react to shaving. Irritation, rashes and ingrown hair are just a few of the problems the ban&#8217;s causing.</p>
<p>Officers are also complaining because they feel the ban negatively affects secondary jobs and earning potential. We&#8217;re not sure what positions would be adversely affected by being clean-shaven &#8212; unless the  officers are moonlighting as lumberjacks, Santa Claus or Father Time.</p>
<img src="http://www.cfosnafu.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=145&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cfosnafu.com/police-balk-at-hairy-expensive-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
