<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CFOsnafu.com &#187; Supply and demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cfosnafu.com/tag/supply-and-demand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com</link>
	<description>Some days it should be legal to keep two sets of books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:27:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Small change loses ground</title>
		<link>http://www.cfosnafu.com/small-change-loses-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cfosnafu.com/small-change-loses-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darlene Watson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Seemed like a good idea at the time"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply and demand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfosnafu.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When something costs more to produce than it&#8217;s worth, why wouldn&#8217;t you get rid of it? That&#8217;s what lawmakers are asking themselves about something you&#8217;ve got in your pocket. According to a 2007 Treasury audit, it now costs 1.7 cents to make a penny and 9.5 cents to make a nickel. As with any manufactured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When something costs more to produce than it&#8217;s worth, why wouldn&#8217;t you get rid of it? That&#8217;s what lawmakers are asking themselves about something you&#8217;ve got in your pocket. <span id="more-78"></span></p>
<p>According to a 2007 Treasury audit, it now costs 1.7 cents to make a penny and 9.5 cents to make a nickel.</p>
<p>As with any manufactured item, the culprit is higher prices on materials. High demand for copper, zinc, and nickel has driven prices up worldwide.</p>
<p>So what are lawmakers proposing? Two ideas are floating around:</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Change      the composition of the coins to control material costs, or</li>
<li>Stop making      pennies all together.</li>
</ol>
<p>Neither idea is new. To help lower costs, the penny&#8217;s composition was changed to steel with a thin zinc coating during World War II.</p>
<p>But a composition change can backfire: The main fear is that people will hoard the current pennies and nickels because they&#8217;re worth more than their face value.</p>
<p>As for dumping the costly currency, far more people seem willing to get rid of the cumbersome copper altogether. But very few support getting rid of nickels since they&#8217;re needed to make change for quarters and dimes.</p>
<p>Also, without a penny-valued currency, all prices would need to be rounded up (or down) to the latest nickel, and that could be a costly move for consumers (or businesses).</p>
<p>The most prominent advocate for keeping the penny: charities. They get a lot of cash from folks dropping pennies into their buckets.</p>
<img src="http://www.cfosnafu.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=78&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cfosnafu.com/small-change-loses-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

